English

This cross-cognitive empirical evidence reinforces the conclusion that the Kurikulum Merdeka aligns with findings at the Senior Secondary (SMA) level. The policy consistently perpetuates social class biases in competencies reliant on hard physical infrastructure (Numeracy), yet successfully triggers a democratizing effect in competencies that are autonomous, culturally grounded, and supported by standardized, free digital tools (Literacy).

Accelerating the quality of upper secondary education in Indonesia is currently confronted with global demands that shift away from merely

The acceleration of upper secondary education quality in Indonesia is currently confronted with global demands that transcend rote memorization. The

Rural schools experience structural isolation from industrial networks, leaving their students’ cognitive achievements lagging far behind. The primary challenge facing vocational education today lies not within curriculum documents, but in the glaring inequalities of industrial capital embedded in the very ground where these schools stand.

Upper secondary education development policies are heavily driven by administrative standardization, particularly through a unified national curriculum intended to equalize

Within the Data-Driven Reflection (RSD) cluster, both the green plot (SMA) and the orange plot (SMK) rest safely to the right of the 0 baseline. This provides visual validation that evidence-based management led by school principals possesses universal efficacy across differing institutional landscapes. Objective data offers clear, actionable guidance for principals to guide their teaching staff effectively.

The greatest hurdle facing the Merdeka Curriculum today is not taming school bureaucracies, but entering remote classrooms, supporting vocational and madrasah educators, and dismantling conventional teaching cultures that have yet to be liberated.

Indonesia must avoid getting trapped in the mere glorification of the Merdeka Curriculum’s administrative rollout. If the government evaluates educational quality solely based on the readiness of paperwork or formal surveys of teacher instruction, it will remain blind to the living social and cultural capital built into frameworks like the madrasah

In an era of disruption defined by asymmetric crises and domino effects, existential threats to a nation no longer follow

This study examines the spatial impact of Indonesia’s Kurikulum Merdeka on rural primary students using a longitudinal Fixed Effects model (2021–2025) across Western, Central, and Eastern regions. The findings reveal a stark policy divergence. In numeracy, the curriculum drives universal, highly significant gains (p<0.01) nationwide, demonstrating the power of streamlined institutional instruction. Conversely, literacy gains stall completely in Eastern Indonesia (0.633, p>0.1). Critical Realist analysis reveals that household-level poverty acts as a structural ceiling, neutralizing administrative reforms. Consequently, closing the regional cognitive gap demands structurally affirmative interventions—such as nutritional support and targeted logistics—rather than mere curricular changes